More and more scientists are joining the 9/11 truth movement. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth have now released an outstanding documentation. Outstanding because bigmouthed activists are likely to be seen as not trustworthy. With their scientific method these people make a difference here.
According to them, tearing down the WTC buildings was no rocket science. But as you will see, firing up one or two (or three) rockets is no rocket science either. You just push a button.
Controlling the mass media has something to do with rockets, too. (You recall the crying girl-agent with the incubator lie, don’t you?) Since operation mockingbird the CIA claims to be able to optain opinion leadership not only in the USA if necessary. Sometimes it is necessary: for freedom, free trade, democracy and in case of extrordinary threats to state security… You get the support not only of the press if you mention these ‘higher values’. As Mr. Vincenco Vinciguerra puts it: "To fight the communist threat, policemen could be convinced _afterwoods_, that it was a ‘necessary evil’, that three of their kollegues had to die in a false flag attack in Italy in 1972 at Peteano." Nobody of them said a single word, they all knew it was a scam. It is astounding: it must have been an atmosphere of obedience, fear and patriotism.
In parallel in 2001 firefighters could have been convinced that it was a necessary evil that the buildings had to be teared down in a controlled demolishion to fight terrorism.
No rocket science either is manipulation of digital images. Typical morphing effects can be seen in some of the official images in slow motion (here, here). Besides, phsyics suggest that a plane would not have entered the building but merely crashed in front and then have fallen down. (see ex 1 2 3 )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeLL0LNF7wI