panta-rhei

On truth.

Very often you hear: «What’s truth anyway? Nobody can tell what is really true.» Truth is relative. But the bandwith of this relativity is somewhat limited. Consequence: you can tell who is a liar, if the bandwidth is exeeded.

People who pretend that skycrapers can crash in a ordered manner or even pulverise through fire are liars. This is physically impossible and everyone can falsify it by watching the official videos. (You probably missed what the architects of these famous buildings had to say, too).

Yet it is not so easy. It is a difference of knowing something and being concious about it. In 1951 Salomon E. Asch made an interesting investigation of a phenomenon called conformity in social groups. His finding was a strong tendency of subjects to represent the false opinion of 5 other persons in the same room which he thought would speak freely. In reality these persons were adviced to give a wrong answer unisono (with one voice).

We all know it is politically incorrect to speak out that 9/11 was a false flag operation, following the strategy of tension. Conformity forces us to suppress valuable information that could lead us to political incorrect insights.

.

While creating awareness of clandestine ugly operations I ask myself:

What is the spirit of these people? It comes to mind they might love death. Some religous thought that at the end we all must die, so death is a mythical thing, a great thing God invented for us. If you know the bible, isn’t it obvious that all of our existence is approaching ‘the last day’, when a new messia is coming, a new order is established, an age of justice (which we are not in now) will come?

Well, there’s a number of problems with this sight actually. First, the mindset of those is based on a fundamental lie, a cognitive dissonance. There’s an unmentioned difference in regard to oneself and the outside world: When talking about amargeddon or last justice, believers think they will be resurected while others are not.

This way it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. (I’ll expand on this later. Self fulfilling prophecy is an underestimated topic BTW).

Second it leads to the paradox that if others die this is actually a good thing (especially when it corresponds to some foresight) – but: for yourself other rules apply. The goal for oneself is different from the goal of everybody else. You are an insider. Others are not.

The paradox is that everybody may claim this POV but obviously not everybody can be right. As a consequence to those people their own death means ~failing~ while the death of others – which claim the same right for themselfes as they do – means success.

Those who fear death most, unconciously seek it for others.

Ich denke, wir brauchen ein neues Zeitalter der Aufklärung. Wir leben nämlich im finstersten Mittelalter was die Massenmedien angeht. Gleichschaltung, Verdummung, Manipulation… 

Auch die Folter-Schauprozesse kommen mir verdächtig bekannt vor. Aufklärung ist also das Ziel. Und zwar durchaus auch im philosophischen Sinne.

Komisch nur, dass es im englischen Wörterbuch keine vernünftige Übersetzung dafür gibt.

Example: The sentense »Aufklärung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbst verschuldeten Unmündigkeit« where the term Unmündigkeit is defined as »Unvermögen, sich seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines andern zu bedienen.« by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804).

All this is translated by en.wikipedia with the following: »Enlightenment is simply the freedom to use one’s own intelligence«. Kewl. That is symptomatic BTW. Wikipedia is n Witz.

Bravissimo. (cazzo in culo)