On truth. <\/p>\n
Very often you hear: «What’s truth anyway? Nobody can tell what is really true.» Truth is relative. But the bandwith of this relativity is somewhat limited. Consequence: you can<\/em><\/strong> tell who is a liar, if the bandwidth is exeeded. <\/p>\n People who pretend that skycrapers can crash in a ordered manner or even pulverise through fire are liars. This is physically impossible and everyone can falsify it by watching the official videos. (You probably missed what the architects of these famous buildings had to say, too).<\/p>\n Yet it is not so easy. It is a difference of knowing something and being concious about it. In 1951 Salomon E. Asch<\/em> made an interesting investigation of a phenomenon called conformity<\/em> in social groups. His finding was a strong tendency of subjects to represent the false opinion of 5 other persons in the same room which he thought would speak freely. In reality these persons were adviced to give a wrong answer unisono (with one voice). <\/p>\n We all know it is politically incorrect to speak out that 9\/11 was a false flag operation, following the strategy of tension<\/a>. Conformity<\/em> forces us to suppress valuable information that could lead us to political incorrect<\/em> insights. <\/p>\n .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On truth. Very often you hear: «What’s truth anyway? Nobody can tell what is really true.» Truth is relative. But the bandwith of this relativity is somewhat limited. Consequence: you can tell who is a liar, if the bandwidth is … Continue reading